Performance-based aid
What happened during those 15 months is evidence of the potential ripple effects of the high-profile aid program – and the power of the threat to publicly shame countries that veer off the path of economic and political overhaul.
…commented John Danilovich, Millennium Challenge CEO, in an interview with the Wall Street Journal (subscription required) on Yemeni reform efforts. Yemen took steps to reduce corruption, cut its budget deficit, and reform its court system after the country lost access to MCCs grant program. The Journal writes:
Mr. Danilovich says the program creates an incentive for countries to make sometimes-painful policy changes, and points to Lesotho as proof. Traditionally, married women in the southern African country had the same legal rights as children; they couldn’t buy land or borrow money without permission from their husbands. With the Millennium Challenge Crop. pressing for changes, the Lesotho Parliament passed a law in November putting married women on equal legal footing with their husbands.
"Countries care really deeply about this seal of approval of good governance," says Sheila Heeling, a senior policy analyst at the Center for Global Development, a Washington think tank, she gives the Millennium Challenge Corp. "full credit" for Yemen's about-face.
The mix of performance-based access to funds and some public finger-pointing appear highly effective. The Millennium Challenge uses some of our Doing Business indicators to measure country performance. Since the Doing Business project started in 2003 the annually updated rankings have inspired reforms in over 50 countries.
Comments (2)
Bookmark
E-mail
Facebook



The question is whether those performance measurements actually mean something. In Lesotho, the courts are years behind in processing cases, and already have to deal with a number of contradictory laws on the books. The independence of judges is far from assured. We have a modern gender law now thanks to pressure from the MCC, but it could be a long, long time before it makes a difference in any woman's life. Or it may not, we will have to wait and see. But I suspect that the historical effectiveness of legislation passed under duress is not too high.
Posted by: paul | Mar 20, 2007 8:58:07 AM
I think Paul's comment means that laws are not enough, but do not think that means pressure is, by definition, ineffective. Once the law is passed, then comes the tedious task of addressing contraditions and making the laws work as intended.
Thanks for the post.
Posted by: Paul Lawrence | Mar 21, 2007 6:07:13 AM