« Previous | Main | Next »

January 17, 2007

2007 Index of Economic Freedom - few surprises

The Heritage Foundation/WSJ 2007 Index of Economic Freedom is out. You'll see familiar faces on the rankings - both at the top (Hong Kong, Singapore, Australia) and at the bottom (North Korea, Cuba, Libya). You might notice the new methodology, which they've helpfully applied to prior year data as well.

I found the new region-by-region overview to be a more interesting read than the fluffier executive summary. A few of the reformers identified in the former - note the comparisons are within each region:

  • [M]ajor reforms in New Zealand and Australia have raised their economic freedom scores and contributed to superior economic performance.
  • Impressively for a post-Communist state, Georgia leads in labor freedom and fiscal freedom because of a combination of low taxes and a highly flexible labor market.
  • Armenia and Macedonia - leaders in freedom from government and monetary freedom, respectively - are other former Communist nations that are rebuilding their economies.
  • Bahrain is moving toward a more business-friendly environment, possibly influenced by the success of the Dubai model.
  • Namibia scores highest in business and trade freedom, showing a strong commitment to free trade and pro-business regulations.
Comments (2) Delicious E-mail Facebook   

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515e9269e200d8353c691153ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 2007 Index of Economic Freedom - few surprises:

Comments

The Index should be read with more than a few grains of salt. The US, for instance, is docked points for raising the minimum wage and collecting taxes from corporations, but is praised for its lax regulatory environment which has led to the subprime mortgage crisis, among other scandals. For a great critique check out http://www.dollarsandsense.org/archives/2005/0305miller.html.


There is no agreement among leading economists that "lax regulatory environment which has led to the subprime mortgage crisis." Indeed, without some of the regulations *requiring* loans to less-than-acceptable mortgagees in the first place, the "crisis" would be much less severe.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

Search

Our Sponsor


Private Sector Home | Public Policy Journal | Toolkits | Business Environment Snapshots | Business Planet
©2009 The World Bank Group, All Rights Reserved. Legal. Terms of Service.