Why Latin nations are poor
Mary Anastasia O'Grady in the Wall Street Journal (WSJ-version, free-version):
It's been 20 years since Hernando de Soto's Lima-based Institute for Liberty and Democracy published "The Other Path," documenting the burdens that the Peruvian state was heaping on the backs of the struggling underclass. But in two decades little has changed in a region mostly known for caudillo government and its capacity to disappoint. More than ever, the Latin predatory state is driving entrepreneurs underground and forcing the most industrious citizens to emigrate, mostly to the U.S.
She is a big fan of our Doing Business report:
The correlation between economic freedom and prosperity is clear from reading the World Bank [Doing Business] ratings. As one would expect, overtaxing and overregulating economic activity stunts growth, as do weak property rights. Much of the region's stagnation is attributable to burdens inflicted by government.
But why hasn't democracy in Latin America produced change?
The answer can be found in public-choice theory… [which] views politics as a market, where the highest bidders have the power to "purchase" what they want. Deregulation may be best for the majority, but politicians don't have an incentive to do it when their most powerful, best-organized constituents -- the ones who put them in office -- prefer the status quo. That includes not only labor unions but rich, established oligarchs and government bureaucrats. Most Latin countries don't have large enough middle classes to counter these oppressive forces, thanks to the twin curses of overregulation and weak property rights.
The next 12 months will be key to the future of much needed Latin American reforms, with no less than a dozen presidential contests and 13 legislative elections over the coming 'year of the vote.'
For more, see the excellent Latinobarómetro poll or the Doing Business press release for Latin America (also in Spanish and Portuguese).
Note: The above map is from The Economist. It is not an officially endorsed World Bank Group map.
Addendum: See Spanish summary by José Carlos Rodríguez.
Comments (2)
Bookmark
E-mail
Facebook



Antigua & Barbuda has illegally expropriated Half Moon Bay Resort, the private property of its long standing US owners. This action places it in breach of international law and custom, the Caribbean Basin initiative and other trade treaties.
The US Government has politely warned of the consequences.
The Island claims to have adopted best practise, joined MIGA, received IMF support and claims that its compliance with international standards and WTO approval makes it able to advise the British Government about e-gaming legislation.
Antigua & Barbuda’s Attorney General proposes signing a side letter to deliberately mislead international lenders and supranational agencies over an imporatnt re-investment matter.
Its Court Registry, unusually overseen by the Office of the Attorney General, consistently loses certain key case files resulting in delays and increases in the cost of obtaining proper justice.
Harassment and threats against the legitimate owners are openly, politically encouraged almost daily.
Some other regional countries admire the business model and other local private vested interests assume the posture of vultures.
Is it any wonder that Latin nations are poor?
Posted by: Ian Moncrief-Scott | Mar 1, 2007 2:19:07 PM
Gavin Miller QC was yesterday, 6 March 2007, prevented by Justice Louise Blenman from representing Half Moon Bay Holdings Limited in its case against the Antigua & Barbuda Government for its illegal expropriation of their private property.
Miller claimed that Attorney General Justin Simon had used his office to prevent his appearance in court.
According to the Antigua Sun, the Antigua & Barbuda Bar Association contended that “United Kingdom practitioners seek to practise in Antigua, but they do not permit Antiguans to practise in the United Kingdom, so therefore he is outside of the law. And accordingly we have registered our objections with the court and the Association stands by that position”.
The matter serves as a further warning to potential foreign investors not to expect justice from the Courts of Antigua & Barbuda and to question whether the judiciary is independent.
Despite claims to the contrary, little has changed since the Center for Strategic and International Studies issued its report in 1999 by Douglas W payne “The Failings of Governance in Antigua and Barbuda”.
Posted by: Ian Moncrief-Scott | Mar 7, 2007 10:39:25 AM