« Previous | Main | Next »

August 25, 2005

Make aid, or buy it?

Embrace the increasing competitiveness of the aid 'market' and use it to make the market work better. There is no reason that the agencies that set priorities and donate money need to be the agencies that use the money to deliver services. Should aid agencies 'make aid' or simply 'buy aid'? Since competition would probably be much more productive between service delivery organizations than between donor organizations, this split has some attractions. There are several ways in which it might happen...

This is from chapter two of The Market for Aid, and also available in this short note on Aid Agency Competition.

Comments (1) Delicious E-mail Facebook   

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834515e9269e200d83489736969e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Make aid, or buy it?:

Comments

The bigger question seems to be: why aid agencies in the first place? Perhaps a better way might be to limit (and downsize) aid agencies towards grant-delivery, and just letting developing countries access capital markets. It is possible (likely?) that profligate dictators like Marcos would have had a harder time stealing foreign money had his government been forced to float bonds.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this weblog until the author has approved them.

Search

Our Sponsor


Private Sector Home | Public Policy Journal | Toolkits | Business Environment Snapshots | Business Planet
©2009 The World Bank Group, All Rights Reserved. Legal. Terms of Service.